The package is not a malware because the evidence presented is insufficient to make that determination. Evidence 0 points to a low number of published versions, suggesting immaturity or lack of maintenance. However, this alone is not indicative of malicious intent. Many legitimate open-source projects, especially smaller ones, have a limited number of releases. The low number of stars and forks on the GitHub project (63 stars, 23 forks) might raise a slight suspicion, as it suggests a smaller community and less scrutiny. However, this is not conclusive proof of maliciousness. The absence of other evidence, such as YARA rule matches, LLM analysis, or suspicious code behavior, is crucial. Without further concrete evidence of malicious functionality, such as backdoors, data exfiltration, or system compromise attempts, classifying this package as malware would be a false positive. More comprehensive analysis is needed before a definitive conclusion can be reached.